• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


The 'Three Strikes Law' is a legal mandate in the United States that significantly increases the prison sentences of individuals convicted of a third felony, often resulting in life sentences. This policy aims to deter repeat offenders but has been criticized for contributing to prison overcrowding and disproportionately affecting minority communities.
Mandatory minimum sentencing requires judges to impose a predetermined minimum sentence for specific crimes, often related to drug offenses and violent crimes, removing judicial discretion. Critics argue it leads to overcrowded prisons and disproportionately affects minority communities, while proponents claim it ensures consistency and deters crime.
Concept
Recidivism refers to the tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend, highlighting challenges in the criminal justice system related to rehabilitation and societal reintegration. Understanding and addressing recidivism involves examining factors like social support, employment opportunities, and the effectiveness of correctional programs.
Disproportionate impact refers to the adverse effects of policies, practices, or events that unequally affect certain groups, often marginalized or minority populations, more than others. It highlights the need for equity-focused analysis to ensure that systemic inequalities are not perpetuated or exacerbated by seemingly neutral actions.
Deterrence theory posits that individuals are less likely to commit a crime if they perceive the consequences as severe, certain, and swift. It is widely applied in criminal justice policies to prevent crime by instilling fear of punishment.
Judicial discretion refers to the power and flexibility given to judges to make decisions based on their own judgment and interpretations within the framework of the law. It allows judges to consider the unique circumstances of each case, but also raises concerns about consistency, impartiality, and potential bias in judicial decision-making.
Prison overcrowding is a critical issue where the inmate population exceeds the capacity of correctional facilities, leading to detrimental effects on living conditions, safety, and rehabilitation efforts. It often results from factors such as stringent sentencing laws, high recidivism rates, and inadequate infrastructure investment, necessitating comprehensive reform to address systemic inefficiencies and human rights concerns.
Sentencing guidelines are established frameworks used by judges to determine appropriate sentences for criminal offenses, aiming to ensure consistency and fairness in sentencing across similar cases. These guidelines often consider factors such as the severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and mitigating or aggravating circumstances to recommend a sentencing range or specific penalty.
Mandatory sentencing refers to the legal practice of imposing fixed, predetermined sentences for specific crimes, removing judicial discretion in individual cases. While designed to ensure uniformity and deterrence, it often leads to disproportionately harsh penalties and contributes to prison overcrowding.
3