• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Moral complexity refers to the intricate and often conflicting nature of ethical decision-making, where clear-cut right or wrong choices are obscured by nuanced circumstances and competing values. It underscores the challenge of navigating moral dilemmas that require balancing diverse ethical principles, personal beliefs, and societal norms.
Ethical dilemmas occur when a person faces a choice between two or more morally conflicting options, where choosing one option means transgressing another moral principle. These situations often require individuals to prioritize values and make decisions that align with their ethical beliefs, despite potential consequences.
Moral relativism is the philosophical view that moral judgments and values are not absolute but are instead shaped by cultural, historical, or personal circumstances. It challenges the notion of universal moral truths, suggesting that what is considered right or wrong can vary significantly across different societies and contexts.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that suggests the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility. It evaluates actions based on their consequences, aiming for the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Deontological ethics is a moral theory that emphasizes the importance of duty and adherence to rules or obligations, rather than the consequences of actions, in determining moral rightness. It is often associated with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, who argued that actions are morally right if they are motivated by a sense of duty and conform to universal moral laws.
Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of actions based solely on their outcomes or consequences. It posits that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number, often associated with utilitarianism.
Moral pluralism is the philosophical idea that there are multiple, equally valid moral principles or values that may sometimes conflict with each other, yet none can be deemed the absolute truth. It emphasizes the complexity of moral reasoning and the need for tolerance and dialogue in navigating diverse ethical perspectives.
Ethical subjectivism is the philosophical theory that moral judgments are statements of one's personal feelings or attitudes, and that there are no objective moral truths. It suggests that what is 'right' or 'wrong' is entirely dependent on individual perspectives, leading to a diverse range of moral interpretations based on personal or cultural viewpoints.
Moral absolutism is the ethical belief that certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of context or consequences. It contrasts with moral relativism, which suggests that morality is context-dependent and subjective.
Situational ethics is a moral theory that suggests ethical decisions should be made based on the specific context of a situation rather than following absolute rules. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the nuances and unique circumstances of each scenario to determine the most ethical course of action.
Ethical Pluralism is the view that there are multiple, sometimes conflicting, moral principles that can be equally valid and applicable in different situations. It acknowledges the complexity of moral decision-making and rejects the notion of a single, overarching ethical theory that can address all moral dilemmas.
3