• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Ethical subjectivism is the philosophical theory that moral judgments are statements of one's personal feelings or attitudes, and that there are no objective moral truths. It suggests that what is 'right' or 'wrong' is entirely dependent on individual perspectives, leading to a diverse range of moral interpretations based on personal or cultural viewpoints.
Moral relativism is the philosophical view that moral judgments and values are not absolute but are instead shaped by cultural, historical, or personal circumstances. It challenges the notion of universal moral truths, suggesting that what is considered right or wrong can vary significantly across different societies and contexts.
Subjective morality posits that moral judgments and values are based on personal feelings, opinions, and cultural influences rather than universal truths. This perspective suggests that what is considered morally right or wrong can vary significantly between individuals and societies.
Concept
Emotivism is a meta-ethical view that suggests moral statements do not convey objective truths but rather express the speaker's emotions or attitudes. It implies that moral disagreements are not about facts but are instead conflicts of emotional responses or preferences.
Individualism emphasizes the moral worth of the individual, advocating for personal independence and self-reliance as opposed to collective or state control. It is a foundational principle in many Western societies, influencing political, economic, and cultural systems by prioritizing personal freedom and autonomy.
Moral skepticism is the philosophical view that questions the existence of objective moral truths, suggesting that moral beliefs are not justified or knowledge-based. It challenges the validity of moral judgments and often leads to the conclusion that moral claims are subjective or relative.
Cultural relativism is the principle that an individual's beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual's own culture, promoting the idea that no culture is superior to another. This perspective encourages the examination of cultural practices without ethnocentric bias, fostering a deeper appreciation and understanding of cultural diversity.
Moral non-cognitivism is the meta-ethical view that moral statements do not express propositions or truths but rather emotional attitudes or prescriptions. It challenges the notion that moral discourse is about stating facts, suggesting instead that it functions to express feelings or commands.
Ethical relativism is the philosophical view that moral judgments and ethical standards are not universal and can vary based on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives. It challenges the notion of absolute moral truths, suggesting that what is considered morally right or wrong depends on specific contexts and cultural norms.
Moral disagreement arises when individuals or groups have conflicting views on what is right or wrong, often influenced by cultural, religious, or personal beliefs. It highlights the complexity of ethical reasoning and the challenges of finding common ground in pluralistic societies.
Ethical Contextualism is the philosophical view that the truth-value or justification of moral claims depends on the context in which they are made, suggesting that moral judgments are not universally applicable but are influenced by cultural, social, and situational factors. This approach allows for flexibility in moral reasoning, acknowledging that different contexts may yield different ethical conclusions while still maintaining a coherent moral framework.
Moral autonomy refers to the capacity of an individual to make moral decisions independently, guided by their own principles and reasoning rather than external influences. It is a cornerstone of ethical theories that emphasize personal responsibility and the development of one's moral compass through critical reflection and self-governance.
Moral perfection is the philosophical idea that individuals can attain a state of flawless ethical virtue, often by adhering to a set of principles or virtues. It is a contentious concept, as it raises questions about human nature, the attainability of perfection, and the subjective nature of morality.
Cultural ethics explores how ethical norms and values are shaped by cultural contexts, emphasizing the importance of understanding diverse cultural perspectives in ethical decision-making. It challenges the notion of universal ethics by arguing that moral principles can vary significantly across different societies and cultural backgrounds.
Ethical egoism is a normative theory that suggests individuals should act in their own self-interest and that such actions are morally right if they maximize personal benefit. It contrasts with altruism and poses challenges in balancing self-interest with the welfare of others, often sparking debates about morality and ethical behavior in society.
Moral Nihilism is the philosophical viewpoint that moral truths do not inherently exist, meaning that no action is objectively right or wrong. It challenges the foundation of ethical systems by denying the existence of universal moral values, suggesting that morality is a human construct without absolute grounding.
Descriptive relativism is the anthropological view that different cultures have distinct moral codes and practices, and that these differences are empirical observations rather than normative judgments. It emphasizes understanding and documenting cultural diversity without making evaluative claims about the superiority or inferiority of any particular moral system.
The Euthyphro dilemma, presented by Plato, questions whether something is good because God commands it, or if God commands it because it is good, challenging the foundation of divine command theory. This dilemma raises significant issues in moral philosophy regarding the independence of morality from divine authority and the nature of piety and ethics.
Concept
Relativism is the philosophical position that asserts that truth and moral values are not absolute but are relative to the perspectives or cultural contexts from which they arise. This viewpoint challenges the notion of universal truths, suggesting that what is considered true or ethical can vary based on differing frameworks and experiences.
Value subjectivism posits that the value of an object, idea, or action is not inherent but is instead determined by the individual's personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. This perspective suggests that what is considered valuable can vary greatly from one person to another, challenging the notion of universal values.
Ayer's emotivism posits that ethical statements do not express factual propositions but are instead expressions of emotional attitudes or commands. This theory suggests that when we say something is 'good' or 'bad', we're not stating an objective truth but rather expressing our feelings or trying to influence others.
Moral complexity refers to the intricate and often conflicting nature of ethical decision-making, where clear-cut right or wrong choices are obscured by nuanced circumstances and competing values. It underscores the challenge of navigating moral dilemmas that require balancing diverse ethical principles, personal beliefs, and societal norms.
Agent-centered morality focuses on the moral duties and responsibilities of the individual, emphasizing that ethical decisions should be made based on the agent's own moral standards and the context of their actions. It contrasts with outcome-based ethics by prioritizing the moral integrity and intentions of the individual over the consequences of their actions.
Ethical propositions are statements that assert what is morally right or wrong, good or bad, within a specific context or universally. They serve as the foundation for ethical reasoning and decision-making, guiding individuals and societies in evaluating actions and behaviors.
3