• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


    Learning PlansCourses
Normativity refers to the phenomenon of standards or norms that guide, evaluate, or prescribe behaviors, actions, and beliefs, often implying a sense of obligation or correctness. It is central to discussions in ethics, law, and epistemology, as it addresses questions about what ought to be rather than what is.
Moral normativity refers to the idea that moral principles or rules have an authoritative or binding force, compelling individuals to act in accordance with them. It explores the nature of moral obligations and the reasons why individuals should adhere to ethical standards, often intersecting with discussions on moral realism, constructivism, and the role of reason in ethics.
Epistemic normativity refers to the standards and rules that govern our beliefs and the processes by which we acquire them, emphasizing the importance of justification, evidence, and rationality in forming beliefs. It explores how we ought to form beliefs, rather than how we do, highlighting the normative aspect of epistemology that seeks to distinguish between justified and unjustified beliefs.
Deontic Logic is a branch of modal logic that deals with normative concepts such as obligation, permission, and prohibition, providing a formal framework to reason about ethical and legal propositions. It extends classical logic by introducing modal operators that capture the nuances of normative reasoning, allowing for the analysis of statements about what is permitted, forbidden, or obligatory.
Concept
Metaethics explores the nature, scope, and meaning of moral judgments, questioning the foundations of ethical principles and whether they are objective or subjective. It delves into the semantics, metaphysics, epistemology, and psychology of moral thought, distinguishing itself from normative ethics and applied ethics by focusing on the underlying assumptions and implications of moral discourse.
1
Social norms are the unwritten rules that govern behavior in society, influencing how individuals act and interact within their cultural context. They shape expectations, promote conformity, and can vary significantly across different communities and cultures, affecting everything from daily interactions to broader societal structures.
Legal normativity refers to the idea that legal systems inherently possess a normative dimension, meaning they not only describe what the law is but also prescribe what ought to be done. It encompasses the binding nature of legal rules and the moral obligation to follow them, influencing legal reasoning and decision-making processes.
Practical reasoning involves the process of deciding what to do by evaluating actions in terms of their outcomes and how they align with one's goals and values. It is a critical aspect of decision-making that balances logical analysis with personal desires and ethical considerations.
Prescriptive language refers to the set of rules and norms that dictate how a language should be used, often emphasizing correct grammar, usage, and pronunciation. It contrasts with descriptive language, which focuses on how language is actually used by speakers in everyday contexts.
Value theory explores the nature of value and valuation, examining what makes actions, objects, or states of affairs valuable or worthwhile. It encompasses both ethical and economic dimensions, analyzing how value is assigned and understood across different contexts and frameworks.
Normative language refers to expressions that convey values, obligations, or what ought to be, often used to prescribe or evaluate actions and behaviors. It contrasts with descriptive language, which aims to describe facts or states of the world without judgment.
Epistemic relativism is the philosophical view that the truth or justification of beliefs is relative to the frameworks or cultures in which they arise, meaning there is no objective standard for evaluating the truth of knowledge claims. This challenges the notion of universal truth, suggesting that what is considered true or justified can vary across different epistemic systems.
Inferentialism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes the role of inference in understanding meaning, suggesting that the meaning of a statement is determined by its role in the network of inferences. It contrasts with representational views of meaning, focusing on the normative rules governing the use of language rather than its correspondence to the world.
Legal validity refers to the characteristic of a rule or law that makes it binding and enforceable within a legal system. It is determined by the rule's conformity to established procedural and substantive criteria, often rooted in a jurisdiction's constitution or legal framework.
Biopolitics is a framework that examines the strategies and mechanisms through which human life processes are managed under regimes of authority over knowledge, power, and subjectivity. It involves the governance of populations through an intersection of biological and political considerations, reflecting how states exercise control over the biological aspects of citizens' lives.
Concept
The status quo refers to the existing state of affairs or the current condition of a situation, often implying resistance to change. It serves as a benchmark for evaluating potential changes, highlighting the tension between maintaining stability and pursuing progress.
Deontic modality is a linguistic and philosophical concept that expresses necessity, obligation, or permission within a given context, often involving social or moral norms. It contrasts with epistemic modality, which deals with the likelihood or certainty of events or propositions.
Moral Generalism is the philosophical view that moral principles are generalizations that can guide moral reasoning, but are not exceptionless laws. It contrasts with moral particularism, which denies that moral principles hold universally across all situations, emphasizing the importance of context in moral judgment.
Symbolic violence is a form of non-physical violence manifested in the imposition of systems of meaning and cultural norms that maintain social hierarchies and power dynamics. It operates subtly through language, education, and social institutions, reinforcing inequalities by legitimizing the dominance of certain groups over others.
Demarcation refers to the process of setting boundaries or limits, often used in contexts like philosophy of science to distinguish between science and non-science. It is crucial for clarifying the scope and domain of disciplines, ensuring that methodologies and epistemologies are appropriately applied.
Institutional facts are social constructs that depend on human agreement and are given power through collective acceptance, playing critical roles in shaping societal functions and structures. They contrast with brute facts, which exist independently of human beliefs and interpretations, and they are underpinned by rules and conventions that give them meaning and facilitate order in societies.
Analytical jurisprudence seeks to systematically and logically clarify legal concepts and structures, focusing on the meanings of legal terms and the nature of law itself instead of the moral or social implications. It emphasizes understanding the abstract principles underpinning legal systems and the logical relationships between legal norms, providing a foundation for interpreting and comparing different legal theories and systems.
3