• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Minimal scrutiny is a judicial standard of review used to evaluate laws or governmental actions that are presumed to be constitutional, requiring only that the law or action be rationally related to a legitimate government interest. It is the most lenient form of judicial review, often applied in cases involving economic regulation or social welfare policies.
Constitutional law is the body of law that interprets and applies the foundational legal framework of a country, defining the structure of government and the rights of individuals. It serves as the supreme legal authority, guiding the creation, execution, and evaluation of all other laws and government actions to ensure they align with the constitution's principles.
A 'legitimate government interest' is a legal standard used to justify government actions that may infringe upon individual rights, requiring that the action serves a significant, lawful purpose. It is often assessed in the context of constitutional law to ensure that governmental measures are not arbitrary and are aligned with public welfare, safety, or order.
Economic regulation involves government intervention to influence market outcomes, ensuring fairness, competition, and efficiency. It aims to correct market failures, protect consumers, and achieve social objectives by setting rules and standards for industries.
Social welfare policies are government initiatives designed to provide assistance and support to individuals and families in need, aiming to enhance their quality of life and promote social equity. These policies encompass a wide range of services such as healthcare, education, housing, and income support, and are crucial for addressing social inequalities and ensuring a safety net for vulnerable populations.
Rational Basis Review is the most lenient standard of judicial review used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of a law, requiring only that the law be rationally related to a legitimate government interest. It is typically applied in cases where no fundamental rights or suspect classifications are at issue, giving deference to legislative judgment.
3