• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Moral desert refers to the idea that individuals deserve certain outcomes based on their moral actions, aligning rewards and punishments with one's ethical conduct. It plays a crucial role in discussions of justice, responsibility, and moral philosophy, influencing how societies consider fairness and accountability.
Proportionality is a fundamental principle in mathematics and science that describes a relationship where two quantities increase or decrease at the same rate, maintaining a constant ratio. It is essential for understanding linear relationships and is widely applied in fields ranging from physics to economics to ensure fairness and balance.
Concept
Justice is a foundational principle that seeks to ensure fairness, equality, and moral rightness within a society. It encompasses the distribution of resources, protection of rights, and imposition of appropriate punishment or reward based on ethical and legal standards.
Concept
Punishment is a method used to decrease or eliminate unwanted behavior by applying a negative consequence or removing a positive stimulus. It is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology and ethics, often debated regarding its effectiveness and moral implications.
Moral responsibility refers to the status of being accountable for one's actions, especially in terms of ethical or moral obligations. It involves the capacity to understand and act upon moral principles, and is often linked to concepts of free will, blame, and praise.
Retributive justice is a theory of justice that holds individuals should be punished for their wrongdoing in proportion to the severity of their crime, emphasizing moral responsibility and the idea of 'just deserts.' It contrasts with other justice theories by focusing on punishment as an end in itself, rather than as a means to achieve social benefits like deterrence or rehabilitation.
Desert Theory in ethics and political philosophy posits that individuals deserve certain treatments or outcomes based on their actions, character, or contributions. It emphasizes the moral significance of merit and justice, often contrasting with theories that prioritize equality or need-based distribution.
Concept
Deterrence is a strategy aimed at preventing an adversary from taking an unwanted action by threatening credible consequences. It relies on the perception of capability and resolve to impose costs that outweigh the benefits of the adversary's potential actions.
Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of actions based solely on their outcomes or consequences. It posits that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number, often associated with utilitarianism.
Deontological ethics is a moral theory that emphasizes the importance of duty and adherence to rules or obligations, rather than the consequences of actions, in determining moral rightness. It is often associated with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, who argued that actions are morally right if they are motivated by a sense of duty and conform to universal moral laws.
The 'Just Deserts' theory in justice asserts that individuals should receive punishment proportionate to the severity of their wrongdoing, emphasizing retribution rather than deterrence or rehabilitation. It is rooted in the moral philosophy that justice is served when wrongdoers get what they deserve, reflecting a balance between crime and punishment.
Retribution is a theory of justice that argues for punishment as a morally justified response to wrongdoing, emphasizing that offenders deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. It focuses on balancing the scales of justice by ensuring that the punishment fits the crime, rather than emphasizing deterrence or rehabilitation.
3