• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Retributive justice is a theory of justice that holds individuals should be punished for their wrongdoing in proportion to the severity of their crime, emphasizing moral responsibility and the idea of 'just deserts.' It contrasts with other justice theories by focusing on punishment as an end in itself, rather than as a means to achieve social benefits like deterrence or rehabilitation.
The 'Just Deserts' theory in justice asserts that individuals should receive punishment proportionate to the severity of their wrongdoing, emphasizing retribution rather than deterrence or rehabilitation. It is rooted in the moral philosophy that justice is served when wrongdoers get what they deserve, reflecting a balance between crime and punishment.
Proportionality is a fundamental principle in mathematics and science that describes a relationship where two quantities increase or decrease at the same rate, maintaining a constant ratio. It is essential for understanding linear relationships and is widely applied in fields ranging from physics to economics to ensure fairness and balance.
Moral responsibility refers to the status of being accountable for one's actions, especially in terms of ethical or moral obligations. It involves the capacity to understand and act upon moral principles, and is often linked to concepts of free will, blame, and praise.
Punishment Theory explores the justification and purpose of imposing penalties on individuals who violate laws or norms. It encompasses various philosophical perspectives, including retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and societal protection, each offering different rationales for why and how punishment should be administered.
Retribution is a theory of justice that argues for punishment as a morally justified response to wrongdoing, emphasizing that offenders deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. It focuses on balancing the scales of justice by ensuring that the punishment fits the crime, rather than emphasizing deterrence or rehabilitation.
Justice Theory explores the principles and frameworks that define what is fair and just in society, often focusing on the distribution of resources, rights, and opportunities. It seeks to balance individual rights with the common good, addressing inequalities and ensuring that all members of society are treated equitably.
Concept
Deterrence is a strategy aimed at preventing an adversary from taking an unwanted action by threatening credible consequences. It relies on the perception of capability and resolve to impose costs that outweigh the benefits of the adversary's potential actions.
Rehabilitation is a process aimed at enabling individuals to reach and maintain their optimal physical, sensory, intellectual, psychological, and social functional levels. It involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes medical, therapeutic, and social interventions to improve quality of life and independence.
Legal philosophy, or jurisprudence, is the theoretical study of law, exploring its nature, purposes, sources, and the principles that govern legal systems. It critically examines the relationship between law, morality, and society, and seeks to understand how legal norms are created, interpreted, and enforced.
Ethical theories provide frameworks for evaluating moral actions and decisions, guiding individuals and societies in determining what is right or wrong. They encompass various perspectives, such as consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, each offering unique principles and criteria for ethical judgment.
Proportionality in sentencing is a legal principle that ensures the severity of a sentence is commensurate with the gravity of the offense and the culpability of the offender. It aims to achieve fairness and justice by preventing excessively harsh or lenient punishments that could undermine public trust in the legal system.
Proportionality in punishment is a principle in criminal justice that mandates the severity of a penalty to be commensurate with the seriousness of the crime committed. It aims to ensure fairness and justice by preventing excessively harsh or unduly lenient sentences, thus maintaining public confidence in the legal system.
Concept
Qisas is an Islamic legal principle that allows for retributive justice, where the punishment mirrors the crime, typically applied in cases of murder or bodily harm. It emphasizes the victim's family's right to seek justice or offer forgiveness, highlighting themes of balance and mercy within Islamic jurisprudence.
Transitional justice refers to the set of judicial and non-judicial measures implemented by countries to redress legacies of massive human rights abuses and to ensure accountability, serve justice, and achieve reconciliation. It encompasses processes and mechanisms such as trials, truth commissions, reparations programs, and institutional reforms aimed at addressing past wrongdoings and preventing future violations.
Criminal penalties are legal sanctions imposed on individuals or entities found guilty of committing crimes, aiming to punish and deter unlawful behavior while promoting justice and public safety. They can vary in severity, ranging from fines and community service to imprisonment and, in some jurisdictions, capital punishment.
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a government-sanctioned practice where a person is executed as a punishment for a crime. It is a controversial and highly debated topic, with arguments centered around morality, deterrence, and the potential for wrongful convictions.
Ethical Retributivism is a theory of punishment that argues individuals should be punished because they deserve it, based on their past actions, rather than for consequentialist reasons like deterrence or rehabilitation. It emphasizes moral accountability and justice, asserting that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed to uphold moral order and societal norms.
Penal policy refers to the strategies and principles that govern the punishment and rehabilitation of offenders within a legal system. It balances societal protection, deterrence, retribution, and the reintegration of offenders, reflecting broader social, political, and ethical values.
Aggravating and mitigating factors are considerations in legal proceedings that can respectively increase or decrease the severity of a sentence or penalty. These factors help ensure that the punishment is proportionate to both the offense and the individual circumstances of the offender.
Legal penalties are sanctions imposed by a legal authority as a consequence of violating laws or regulations, aiming to deter future offenses and provide justice. They can vary widely in severity, including fines, imprisonment, community service, or even capital punishment, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the offense.
Perpetrator accountability refers to the responsibility of individuals who commit harmful acts to be held answerable for their actions, ensuring justice for victims and deterring future offenses. It involves legal, social, and moral mechanisms to acknowledge wrongdoing, impose consequences, and promote rehabilitation or restitution.
Punitive policies refer to measures designed to punish individuals or groups for certain behaviors, often with the intent of deterrence or retribution. These policies can lead to significant social and economic consequences, including increased incarceration rates and broader societal inequalities.
Punitive measures are actions taken to punish individuals or entities for wrongdoing, often with the aim of deterring future misconduct and maintaining social order. These measures can range from fines and imprisonment to sanctions and other forms of disciplinary action, depending on the context and severity of the offense.
Historical penal systems have evolved from retributive justice models, where punishment was often harsh and public, to more rehabilitative approaches that focus on reforming offenders. This evolution reflects broader societal changes in views on justice, human rights, and the role of the state in maintaining social order.
Truth Commissions are official bodies established to investigate and report on past human rights violations, often in post-conflict societies, with the aim of promoting healing and reconciliation. They balance the need for truth-telling with the pursuit of justice, often prioritizing restorative over retributive justice to foster societal healing.
Mercy and justice are often seen as opposing forces in moral and legal philosophy, where justice demands fairness and accountability, while mercy allows for compassion and leniency. The balance between these two principles is crucial in ethical decision-making, as it reflects the tension between upholding the law and recognizing human fallibility.
Desert Theory in ethics and political philosophy posits that individuals deserve certain treatments or outcomes based on their actions, character, or contributions. It emphasizes the moral significance of merit and justice, often contrasting with theories that prioritize equality or need-based distribution.
Concept
Penology is the study of the processes adopted by society to punish and rehabilitate individuals who violate laws, focusing on the effectiveness and moral implications of various correctional methods. It encompasses a range of approaches from incarceration to community-based programs, aiming to balance deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation.
The Code of Hammurabi is one of the oldest deciphered writings of significant length in the world, created around 1754 BC in ancient Mesopotamia. It is a comprehensive set of laws that established standards for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice in the Babylonian society.
3