• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Concept
Knowledge is the accumulation and application of information, skills, and understanding gained through experience, education, or research. It is both a personal and collective resource that evolves over time, shaping individual perspectives and societal progress.
2
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the theory of knowledge, exploring the nature, sources, limitations, and validity of human understanding. It addresses fundamental questions about what knowledge is, how it is acquired, and how we can differentiate between true knowledge and mere belief.
Tacit knowledge is the type of knowledge that is difficult to articulate or transfer to others because it is deeply rooted in personal experience, intuition, and context. It underlies skills and insights that individuals acquire through practice and is often contrasted with explicit knowledge, which can be easily documented and shared.
Explicit knowledge is information that can be easily articulated, codified, and shared, often found in documents, manuals, and databases. It contrasts with tacit knowledge, which is personal and harder to communicate, making Explicit knowledge more accessible and transferable within organizations.
Justified true belief is a traditional model in epistemology that defines knowledge as a belief that is both true and for which one has justification. This model has been challenged by Gettier problems, which demonstrate scenarios where these conditions are met but do not seem to constitute genuine knowledge.
Knowledge management is the systematic process of capturing, distributing, and effectively using knowledge within an organization to enhance performance and innovation. It involves leveraging intellectual capital to gain a competitive advantage by ensuring that valuable insights and expertise are accessible and utilized efficiently.
Cognitive science is an interdisciplinary field that explores the nature of thought, intelligence, and mental processes, integrating insights from psychology, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, philosophy, linguistics, and anthropology. It seeks to understand how information is perceived, processed, and stored by the brain, and how these processes give rise to behaviors and cognitive functions.
Information theory is a mathematical framework for quantifying information, primarily focusing on data compression and transmission efficiency. It introduces fundamental concepts such as entropy, which measures the uncertainty in a set of outcomes, and channel capacity, which defines the maximum rate of reliable communication over a noisy channel.
Concept
Ontology is a branch of philosophy concerned with the study of being, existence, and the categorization of entities within a hierarchy, which is also applied in fields like computer science to structure information and knowledge representation. It involves the identification and formalization of the relationships between concepts, enabling clearer communication and understanding across various domains.
Internalism and externalism are philosophical positions regarding the sources of justification for beliefs, with internalism emphasizing the accessibility of justificatory factors to the subject's consciousness, while externalism allows for factors outside the subject's awareness to contribute to justification. These positions are central to debates in epistemology, particularly concerning the nature of knowledge and the justification of belief.
Propositional attitudes are mental states that involve a relationship between a person and a proposition, reflecting how individuals mentally relate to statements or beliefs about the world. These attitudes are crucial for understanding human cognition, language, and the nature of belief, as they underpin how we interpret, reason, and communicate intentions and knowledge.
The Knowledge Hierarchy, often represented as the DIKW pyramid, organizes information into four levels: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom. This framework helps in understanding how raw data can be transformed into actionable insights and informed decision-making through contextualization and analysis.
Epistemic possibility refers to what could be true based on what is known, emphasizing the limits of knowledge and belief rather than objective reality. It contrasts with metaphysical possibility, which concerns what could be true in any possible world, regardless of human knowledge or belief.
The Data-to-Wisdom Continuum describes the transformation process from raw data to actionable wisdom, emphasizing the increasing value and context added through each stage: data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. This framework helps organizations and individuals understand how to effectively interpret and utilize data for informed decision-making and strategic planning.
The epistemic theory of truth posits that truth is a property of beliefs that are verifiable or justifiable through evidence and reason. It emphasizes the role of human knowledge and understanding in determining what is considered true, contrasting with theories that view truth as an objective correspondence to reality.
Epistemic closure is a principle in epistemology suggesting that if a person knows a particular fact and also knows that this fact implies another, then they should also know the implied fact. This concept is central to discussions on knowledge, skepticism, and the limits of human understanding.
Reliabilism is an epistemological theory that suggests a belief is justified or constitutes knowledge if it is produced by a cognitive process that reliably leads to truth. This approach emphasizes the importance of the reliability of the process rather than the individual's reasoning or evidence in justifying beliefs.
Epistemic Externalism is a theory in epistemology which asserts that factors outside an individual's cognitive access can contribute to the justification of beliefs. It contrasts with internalism by allowing for external factors, such as reliable processes or social environments, to play a role in determining whether a belief is justified or constitutes knowledge.
Research is like being a detective where you look for clues to learn new things and solve problems. It helps us understand the world better and make smart decisions.
To understand and use something better, you need to learn about it and practice a lot. This helps you know how it works and how to use it in the right way.
Niche expertise means being really good at one special thing that not many people know about. It's like being the best at playing a rare game or knowing all about a unique animal that others haven't heard of.
A subject matter expert is someone who knows a lot about a special topic and helps others understand it better. They are like a teacher who knows all the answers about their favorite subject.
Science helps us understand the world around us and solves problems to make our lives better. It is like a big toolbox that helps us learn new things and invent cool stuff.
When you learn something new, like how to count or draw, teachers want to see how well you did. They look at your work to understand how much you learned and how they can help you learn even more next time.
Discovery in science is when we find out something new about how the world works, like finding a new animal or learning how plants grow. It helps us understand things better and solve problems, like making medicine to help sick people feel better.
Wissensgenerierung is like when you learn new things by asking questions and exploring the world around you. It's how we find out more about everything, like how plants grow or why the sky is blue.
Ongoing research is like a never-ending quest to find out more about the world around us. Scientists keep asking questions, doing experiments, and learning new things all the time to help make our lives better.
Epistemic normativity refers to the standards and rules that govern our beliefs and the processes by which we acquire them, emphasizing the importance of justification, evidence, and rationality in forming beliefs. It explores how we ought to form beliefs, rather than how we do, highlighting the normative aspect of epistemology that seeks to distinguish between justified and unjustified beliefs.
Internalism and externalism are philosophical positions that debate the source of justification for beliefs, with internalism arguing that justification comes from within the individual's mental states, and externalism positing that factors outside the individual's mind can also justify beliefs. This distinction is crucial in epistemology, philosophy of mind, and cognitive science, influencing discussions on knowledge, perception, and the nature of mental content.
Justificatory Internalism posits that the justification for a belief must be accessible to the believer, emphasizing that the reasons for holding a belief are internal to the individual's cognitive perspective. This view contrasts with externalist theories, which allow for justification to depend on factors outside the individual's awareness or access.
3