The weighted sum method is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that aggregates multiple criteria into a single objective by assigning weights to each criterion, reflecting their relative importance. This method simplifies complex decision-making processes by converting a multi-objective problem into a single-objective one, making it easier to analyze and solve.
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a process used to evaluate and prioritize multiple conflicting criteria in decision-making scenarios, enabling more informed and balanced decisions. It is widely applied in various fields such as business, engineering, and environmental management to optimize outcomes by considering diverse factors and stakeholder preferences.
The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making tool that helps individuals and organizations prioritize and make optimal decisions by breaking down complex problems into a hierarchy of simpler sub-problems. It uses pairwise comparisons and relies on the judgments of experts to derive priority scales, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of alternatives based on multiple criteria.
Weighted ranking is a method used to prioritize or order items by assigning different weights to various criteria, allowing for a more nuanced evaluation than simple ranking. This approach is particularly useful in decision-making processes where multiple factors must be considered, such as in hiring, project selection, or product evaluation.
Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) is a decision-making process that evaluates and prioritizes multiple competing criteria, providing a structured framework for complex decisions where traditional methods fall short. MCA methodologies enable decision-makers to assess trade-offs and ensure a transparent approach toward selecting the most optimal alternative aligned with strategic goals.