• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


The Borda Count is a voting method used to rank options or candidates by assigning points based on their position in each voter's preference list, with the option receiving the highest total points being the winner. It is particularly useful in situations where consensus is valued over majority rule, as it considers the preferences of all voters rather than just the top choice of each voter.
Ranked voting is an electoral system where voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than voting for a single candidate. This method aims to ensure that the elected candidate has broader support by considering voters' second or third choices if no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes.
Consensus decision making is a way for a group to make a choice that everyone can agree with, even if it's not everyone's first choice. It helps people work together nicely and make sure everyone's ideas are heard and respected.
A positional voting system is a method of voting where voters rank candidates in order of preference, and points are assigned based on the position each candidate holds in a voter's ranking. The candidate with the highest total points across all ballots is declared the winner, offering a compromise between majority rule and proportional representation.
The Condorcet Method is a voting system that elects the candidate who would win a head-to-head competition against each of the other candidates in a majority of the contests. It is based on the principle of pairwise comparison and is designed to reflect the collective preference of the voters more accurately than simple plurality voting systems.
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem demonstrates that no rank-order voting system can convert individual preferences into a community-wide ranking while simultaneously meeting a set of fair criteria, including unrestricted domain, non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency, and independence of irrelevant alternatives. This theorem reveals inherent limitations in designing a perfect voting system, highlighting the trade-offs necessary in collective decision-making processes.
Social Choice Theory explores how individual preferences can be aggregated to reach a collective decision, addressing the challenges of fairness, efficiency, and representation. It encompasses various voting systems and decision-making processes, highlighting the potential for paradoxes and inconsistencies, such as those identified by Arrow's Impossibility Theorem.
Weighted voting is a voting system where different votes have different levels of influence or weight, often used to reflect the varying importance or stake of voters in a decision-making process. This system is commonly employed in corporate governance, political bodies, and cooperative organizations to ensure that decision outcomes fairly represent stakeholders' interests and power dynamics.
A voting mechanism is a method used to aggregate individual preferences to reach a collective decision, often employed in elections or decision-making processes. It aims to ensure fairness, efficiency, and representativeness, while minimizing the potential for strategic manipulation or bias.
Rank aggregation is a method used to combine multiple rankings to produce a single, comprehensive ranking that reflects the collective preferences or assessments of the input rankings. It is widely applied in fields like information retrieval, decision making, and social choice theory to reconcile diverse opinions or data sources into a unified order of preference.
Voting paradoxes occur when collective preferences can be cyclical or inconsistent, even if individual preferences are not, highlighting the complexities and potential flaws in voting systems. These paradoxes can lead to outcomes where no clear winner is determined or where the chosen outcome does not reflect the true preference of the majority.
Voting procedures are structured methods used to aggregate individual preferences into a collective decision, ensuring fairness, transparency, and legitimacy in democratic processes. These procedures can vary widely, from simple majority voting to more complex systems like ranked choice or proportional representation, each with its own implications for representation and governance.
Collective choice refers to the process by which groups make decisions, integrating individual preferences, interests, or welfare into a single collective outcome. It is a central theme in social choice theory and involves mechanisms like voting, consensus-building, and bargaining to resolve conflicts and achieve group objectives.
A voting method is a systematic approach used to determine the outcome of an election or decision-making process, reflecting the preferences of the voters. Different methods can lead to different results, highlighting the importance of choosing an appropriate system for fair representation.
Preference voting is an electoral system that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, ensuring that votes for less popular candidates can be transferred to more preferred ones, thereby reducing wasted votes and promoting a more representative outcome. This method encourages candidates to appeal to a broader constituency and can lead to more consensual and less polarized political landscapes.
A single-winner election is a voting system where one candidate is chosen from a pool of candidates to hold a particular position, based on the majority or plurality of votes. This system is widely used in various democratic processes, emphasizing the importance of each vote in determining the outcome.
3