• Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

  • Concepts

    Concepts

  • Activity

    Activity

  • Courses

    Courses


Publication bias occurs when the outcomes of research influence the likelihood of its publication, often leading to a distortion in the scientific literature as studies with positive results are published more frequently than those with negative or inconclusive results. This bias can skew meta-analyses and systematic reviews, ultimately affecting evidence-based decision-making and policy formulation.
Data dredging, also known as p-hacking, is the misuse of data analysis to find patterns that can be presented as statistically significant without proper hypothesis testing. This practice can lead to false positives and unreliable conclusions, undermining the integrity of scientific research.
Concept
P-hacking refers to the manipulation of statistical analyses to achieve a desired p-value, typically below the 0.05 threshold, which can lead to misleading or false-positive results in scientific research. This practice undermines the integrity of research findings and contributes to the replication crisis in various scientific fields.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. This cognitive bias can lead individuals to give more weight to evidence that supports their beliefs and undervalue evidence that contradicts them, thus reinforcing existing views and potentially leading to poor decision-making.
Cherry picking is a logical fallacy where only select evidence is presented to support a particular stance, while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. This biased selection can lead to misleading conclusions and is often used in debates, research, and decision-making to sway opinions without a comprehensive view of the data.
Research ethics are fundamental guidelines that ensure the integrity, quality, and accountability of scientific research while safeguarding the dignity, rights, and welfare of research participants. Adherence to these ethical standards is crucial for maintaining public trust in scientific findings and for promoting responsible conduct among researchers.
Transparency in research involves openly sharing data, methodologies, and findings to ensure reproducibility, foster trust, and facilitate collaboration within the scientific community. It enhances the credibility of research outputs and enables others to verify and build upon existing work, ultimately advancing knowledge and innovation.
Reproducibility refers to the ability of an experiment or study to be repeated with the same results by different researchers, reinforcing the reliability and validity of scientific findings. It is a cornerstone of the scientific method, ensuring that results are not due to chance or specific conditions of the original study but are consistent and generalizable.
Funding bias refers to the tendency of research outcomes to favor the interests of the financial sponsors, potentially leading to skewed or partial results. It raises ethical concerns and questions about the credibility and objectivity of scientific research, especially when financial interests are at stake.
Reporting bias occurs when the dissemination of research findings is influenced by the nature and direction of the results, leading to a skewed representation of evidence. This can result in an incomplete understanding of a topic, as positive or significant findings are more likely to be published than negative or null results.
Statistical misrepresentation involves the manipulation or distortion of statistical data to support a particular argument or agenda, often leading to misleading conclusions. It can occur through various means such as selective reporting, inappropriate sampling, or biased data visualization, and is a critical concern in data-driven decision-making processes.
Ethics in data presentation involves the responsible and honest portrayal of data to ensure that it accurately reflects reality and does not mislead or deceive the audience. It requires a commitment to transparency, accuracy, and fairness, avoiding manipulation of visualizations or selective reporting that could skew interpretations or decisions.
Pre-registration refers to the practice of registering the research plan, including hypotheses, methodology, and analysis plan, before data collection begins. This process enhances transparency and credibility in research by preventing data dredging and selective reporting of results.
Misrepresentation of data involves presenting data in a misleading way to distort the truth, often to influence opinions or decisions. This unethical practice can occur through selective reporting, manipulating visualizations, or omitting context, leading to false conclusions and undermining trust in data-driven insights.
The 'Crisis in Science' refers to a growing concern over the reproducibility and reliability of scientific findings, highlighting issues such as publication bias, p-hacking, and the pressure to publish. This crisis undermines public trust in science and calls for systemic reforms to ensure the integrity and credibility of scientific research.
3